Caveat: I’ve never been a big fan of “crafting” in MMOs and the like. The idea of spending hours on a computer game collecting different artifacts to put together something for sale just doesn’t do it for me. That’s why I have a job. That’s why I have hobbies. I don’t want to spend my leisure time “crafting” virtual products for sale. If you are the kind of person who does, you will probably disagree with the assessment in this article.
Recently, over on Google+, I shared a few thoughts with Brian Fitzpatrick on a prospective Alchemist class for old-school D&D. Now first, let me say that Brian is in good company. I’m not sure how many versions of an Alchemist class have been developed for D&D, between retro-clones, heartbreakers, Dragon Magazine, Pathfinder, and unattributed home brews, but I’m sure its up there in the Top 10. He’s not breaking new ground, but he’s not trying to get blood from a stone either.
Once upon a time, I loved the idea of NPC classes. Because more is better, right? In a class-based system, the only way to achieve these expressions of diversity is through new classes. It’s not like a skill or advantage-based system where I can spend a few points and BOOM! I’m an alchemist, bitches!
The trouble is, those sorts of classes don’t really work in an adventure/exploration heavy game like D&D. A character class focused solely on a support role just isn’t going to be fun to play over the long haul by the majority of players. Because they never really get a chance to step into the spotlight when it counts. Sure, I’m sure there are a handful of games that sort of class will fit like a glove, but the traditional “let’s explore” D&D game, not so much.
Besides, the rules already provide guidelines for the creation of potions and alchemical devices by clerics, magic-users and elves (even the other character types too, if the GM is flexible and willing to be extrapolate a bit). This makes perfect sense. After all, if we look at the life and career of Isaac Newton, its reasonable that in a quasi-historical fantasy setting all of these skills would have gone together. A “wizard” would of course be able to cook up alchemical concoctions. That would be assumed in the background and training. So you already have the framework for your adventuring alchemist. You can make it as simple or robust as you need it to be.
So my response to Brian was, rather than a class, why not just come up with a more detailed alchemy service? Because that’s what it really comes down to: service and cost. The party hires an alchemist to keep them afloat in healing potions, greek fire, and (in the case of Brian’s class) keep their magic items charged. That stuff really isn’t the bread and butter of adventuring PCs, so lets mitigate it to a support role. Brian disagrees with me on the merits of the class. Which is fine. As I’ve said, he’s in good company and I’m hardly the final word in game design. His argument is as follows:
…I think the party alchemist, especially in a longer campaign with more spellcasters, could be extremely useful. Perhaps not all the time, but more often than not… Here are a few possibilities.
- Imagine having the ability for both a Cleric and an Alchemist to temporarily enchant or improve weapons for the battle at hand
- Or recharging an expended magic item at a critical juncture
- Or creating a scroll, potion or powder from an unused spell at the end of the day “just in case” the party needs it at a future time
If we make the alchemist at lower levels (1-5) more useful for those three tasks, as well as give them a few additional abilities or spells, I think that would be enough to make this a useful player class.
Sure. Or you could simply tweak the magic item research and fabrication rules as they are and achieve almost the same effect without having to wedge a player into a largely supportive role.
- Clerics and magic users can already temporarily enhance weapons for the battle at hand without the extra step of alchemy.
- Recharging expended magic item sounds great, but removes the necessity of further exploration to replace expended resources. Plus, most magic items replicate spell effects, allowing you to put your other limited resources elsewhere.
- The rules already allow this to some degree. Building a class around it is unnecessary.
And that’s really what’s at issue here. Unless alchemy is going to be a big feature of your game (and it could be!), building a class doesn’t really add value to the game. Instead, it provides a character that isn’t as capable as a magic-user or cleric that is focused on downtime activities and with more equipment and resource requirements. See, a magic-user is just as capable whether or not he can find a steady supply of mandrake root to create this or that potion. An alchemist would need to have that same, if not more, utility and versatility.
I’m not saying an adventuring alchemist isn’t a cool idea. But I do think it needs to have a bigger niche than, “you want me to recharge that for ya?”
But I didn’t write this whole thing to shoot down Brian’s hopes and dreams. No, see I want to redirect him a little. Because what I DO NEED, as a DM AND as a player, is a reason to travel 300 miles over land and sea to seek out a MASTER alchemist as opposed to hiring that guy in the base town. And I need a justification as to why that dude charges x10 as much for his services, other than that his calling card reads “Master Alchemist.”
If you look at B/X and AD&D, you’ll see roughly the same thing:
B/X D&D (Expert Rulebook)
Alchemist (1000 gp/month): If given the formula or a sample, an alchemist may make a potion at half the normal time and cost. They may also conduct research into different types of potions at twice the cost and time required for a magic-user.
AD&D Dungeon Masters Guide
Alchemist (300 gp/month): This profession handles the compounding of magical substances, and the advantages of employing an alchemist are detailed under the section FABRICATION OF MAGIC ITEMS, Potions. Alchemists will only be found in cities unless you specifically locate one elsewhere. It will require an offer of 10 to 100 gold pieces bonus money, plus a well-stocked laboratory, plus the assurance of not less than a full year of employment, to attract one to service.
There really isn’t anything there that sets one apart from the other. So there is just as much benefit to tracking down the famed Isaac Newton at University in England as dropping into Ted’s Apothecary and Lubricants for all of your alchemical needs. What I’m proposing would serve the game well would be to grade hirelings by degrees of skill (I’d recommend three tiers to avoid getting too granular and keep the book keeping manageable), with different rates and some different capabilities attached. Ted’s A & L might be a great place to go for low level potions. But for the real heavy hitters (like recharging your wand of fireballs or a potion of super heroism), you have to seek out a Master. And I think it would be worthwhile to do this across the board. There should be a difference between hiring the Black Company and Wallace’s Band of Ne’er-do-Wells. And there really is no guidance on how to do it right now.
I’m going to come back to this eventually on my own, but I suspect someone just as smart and twice as dedicated has already beaten me to the punch on this one. And if not, someone needs to. In the meantime, don’t give up hope on your Alchemist class, Brian. I hear the one in the Arcanum is a fantastic starting point!